Reasoning Substrate Lab
This lab hosts conceptual toys — self-contained, browser-runnable simulations demonstrating the RS, HEG, and RPU architectures in isolation. Each toy is a proof-of-concept harness that makes one architectural idea visible and interactive. Nothing here is production code. Everything here is deterministic.
What is a toy? A minimal, fully self-contained HTML/JS simulation demonstrating one specific behavior of the substrate — auditable, replayable, no external dependencies, no network calls.
What is the HEG? The Human Expression Gateway converts raw human expression — text, audio, gesture, prosody — into typed Cognitive Action Packets (CAPs) via a deterministic operator pipeline: SEGMENT → ACT → TARGET → EMOTION → PATTERN → CAP_BUILD.
What is the RPU? Reasoning Processing Units are a proposed class of hardware accelerators, conceptually designed to execute the Reasoning Substrate (RS) update cycle directly in silicon. RPU Classic is defined around contraction-based deterministic convergence, while RPU Quantum is defined around energy-guided perturbation to escape shallow traps. Our current work focuses on the mathematical architecture and patent foundation for these units, with hardware implementations treated as future targets rather than existing products.
Testing Center
All modules below are TOY-grade — browser-runnable, fully sandboxed, no network calls. Click [ EXPAND ] on any toy to load and run it inline.
100× Deterministic Replay
Four featured tests — agent failsafe, full HEG→CAP→RS pipeline, RPU vs Transformer, and the RSv2 intent orchestration layer.
Wraps a multi-agent orchestration layer (PlannerAgent, DataAgent, ActionAgent) inside an RS v1 cycle. Visualizes state → forward model → plan scoring → collapse. Includes live tool-failure injection to demonstrate RS failsafe and recovery.
Full HEG→CAP→RS pipeline. Choose text, audio, or video presets and watch each expression processed through SEGMENT, ACT, TARGET, EMOTION, PATTERN, and CAP_BUILD into a typed Cognitive Action Packet. Includes audit envelopes and replay/diff.
Side-by-side: Transformer thrashes on complex input, RPU-Classic converges to a fixed point, RPU-Quantum descends an energy landscape. Canvas animations show live energy, state variance, and convergence metrics across all three engines.
Intent Agent → Planner Agent → Executor Agent pipeline on a shared RSv2 memory substrate. Features token budgeting, safety filters, and audit replay. Amber terminal aesthetic throughout.
Six long-horizon stability tests across up to 1M turns: constraint grammar enforcement, drift prevention, isothermal load balancing, multi-agent stability, and full audit & replay.
Translates semantic DSL instructions into typed RS operator graphs then into backend-specific output across compiler, telecom, banking, and networking scenarios.
Simulates CPU/GPU/memory/thermal/battery with four plan modes. RS substrate governs hardware state toward low-entropy configurations.
Stresses the SEGMENT operator with nested intents, abrupt topic shifts, and contradictory instructions.
Targets the ACT operator boundary between COMMAND, ASK, and ASSERT. Exposes scoring heuristics used to disambiguate intent type.
Demonstrates the EMOTION operator at the CAP→RS boundary. High-arousal negative inputs trigger different constraint weighting than neutral equivalents.
Sends the same text through different synthetic audio and video contexts. The FUSION operator produces different CAPs depending on the combined modality signal.
*Illustrative: audio/video inputs are text-described stand-ins for a browser demo, not real signal processing. Shows methodology, not measured multimodal performance.
Flood of hostile packets. Transformer state leaks; RPU-Classic isolates; RPU-Quantum sheds excess via energy-guided shedding.
A 4×4 grid constraint puzzle solved across three engines. Classic applies contraction; Quantum uses perturbation; Transformer iterates without convergence guarantees.
User-defined constraints compiled into E(x) energy function. Both RPU variants minimize from random starting states.
A single reasoning state traverses a visualized energy surface. Classic follows gradient descent; Quantum adds noise to escape local minima.
8×8 multi-cell grid descends energy simultaneously. Color shows cells from high-energy (red) to stable (green).
Six agents navigate a shared space. Quantum agents receive a mid-run perturbation that Classic agents do not.
GPU-style power and thermal spikes versus RPU flat-and-cool energy descent. Bar charts show real-time power draw and heat generation.
*Illustrative: power/thermal curves are stylized for demonstration, not measured from real workloads. Shows methodology, not benchmarked performance.
Episode-based learning loop with fitness scoring and bounded parameter updates. Agents improve across episodes without gradient descent.
Lite Demo Engines
LITE demos are architectural miniatures — small, precise, and intentionally incomplete. They show how the system thinks, stabilizes, collapses, and converges, without exposing the underlying substrate or proprietary operator calculus. Each LITE is a functional slice: enough to demonstrate capability and behavior; not enough to reveal the crown jewels.
Available for short-term exclusivity evaluation — contact matt@icpub.org.
Each LITE keeps the real structural elements: the state model, the update rules, the evolution loop, the trace format, and the measurable outputs. This makes them ideal for modeling, scaling tests, integration work, and technical evaluation, without exposing sensitive substrate-level mechanisms. They are small, deterministic, and fully inspectable.
In Development // Lab Machines
Full-scale systems, deep-architecture engines, and substrate-level frameworks. Not prototypes, not products, and not promises — active constructions, each representing a future layer of the cognitive stack.
Whitepapers
Foundational research and patent filings covering the RS, HEG, and RPU architectures.
Patents pending: USPTO# 64/093,303 | USPTO# 19/707,753 | USPTO# 19/675,481 | USPTO# 19/543,866 | USPTO# 19/543,534 | USPTO# 19/543,514
Contact
This is a conceptual research lab — not a production system. All toys and demonstrations are self-contained simulations intended to expose architectural behavior.
For licensing inquiries, acquisition discussions, or LITE-grade module access:
No data is collected. No network calls are made from any toy.